Parenthood – Ethical DilemmaAugust 8, 2020 2022-02-17 17:59
Parenthood – Ethical Dilemma
Parenthood – Ethical Dilemma
Love for your own child is very incredible and the best feeling ever that one can ever experience. Parenthood is defined by love for the children. Literally, parenthood is characterized by sacrifice and understanding. There is a natural bond between a parent and the child. A parent would do anything no matter how dangerous or illegal it is for her child to ensure the child’s well-being is met. Suppose I was a professional ethicist in an instance whereby a parent approached me with an urgent ethical dilemma of a situation whereby her child is ill and requires expensive medical treatment so as to recover and live but they are lacking financial resources and medical insurance to receive treatment other than stealing medicine from a friend pharmacist in town. With regards to the consequences that would arise later out of stealing the treatment medicine from the pharmacist, understanding it to be likely to cost some amount of money to replace it and also leading to friendship betrayal even it is not found out by the pharmacist. Personally, I would consider suggesting for the stealing of the medication by justifying it with the end result that it will save a life and retain the child to the parent relationship for a prosperous and healthy growth. According to the ethics of care, the advice would be to tell the parent to go ahead and steal the medication so as to save the child’s life if even if it entails betraying her friendship(Engster and Hamington, 38). Since this theory places family needs above moral duties, apparently the parent should do whatever it takes so as to ensure that the child’s life is saved by being cured (Ashcroft et al., 122). In essence, the present moral theory of care ethics does not apply under the rules of principles allowing for the probability of undertaking things which are normally not allowed only when it involves a close relationship such as that of a child and a parent.
Even though stealing is often regarded to be one of the significant obsolete moral actions. Apparently, from a moral perspective, stealing, in this case, is right since the parent is justified by her responsibility that she has to take care of the child. As other theories emphasize on fairness while lugubriously basing on the end results of justice, the theory takes into consideration the necessity to uphold family ties (Collins, 13). Because of this fact as well as the urgent need of action for the situation, it is apparent that the parent requires taking action instantly so as to maintain her moral duty to satisfy the child’s needs that will lead to an opportunity for developing a more robust relationship between them. The act of saving the life of the child will impact the bondage between the child and the parent and as well provide several opportunities for new relationships to be formed in the future, like friends, or even provide the likelihood for future generation as well are reproductions leading to a life that is pleasurable. Moreover, care ethics as a moral strategy considering love which shows the significance of emotions as well as taking action on them, possess an interesting tactic to morality asserting that the most rudimentary ethical relationship is the one between a child and the mother in a way that moral theories need to be excluded in the relationship (Held, 111). Despite the friendship betrayal and probable legal consequences due to the stolen medication is the ultimate alternative since our obligation to family members outdo the requirements of friends.
The major dilemma that the parent faces in stealing the medication is for the reason that the pharmacist is a friend to her whom they are very close. The parent is vividly privy of the outcomes for the betrayal yet near the pharmacist where she is looking for advice whether stealing from her friend’s pharmacist to save the life of her child would be morally wrong. Suppose the pharmacist does not notice the theft it will not impact the friendship between them though suppose the activity was undertaken without malicious intentions and plan for the payment. Even though there is a friendship that exists between the pharmacist and the parent, I assume that this action would still be supported by the care ethics since family ranking is a priority in the significance of the relationships, mostly for the mother-child relationship (Held, 32). Based on my individual observation, the parent and the pharmacist do not look to be close because friends are the ones you can have secrets with, talk with, and also seek help from them. However, we are not aware if the pharmacist is aware of the situation at hand as well as its urgency though regardless even if the pharmacist was aware and failed to help in any way. Through natural care, the feeling of care arising from instances that someone needs help is the only way people can give a helping hand. It is natural in a friendship to have a feeling of compassion towards other people in pain requiring our help with regards to the fact that medicine is his major (Engster, 64). Suppose the pharmacist and the parent were having any kind of actual relationship between them, the pharmacist would have been told about the situation and he would have taken action to help the child to obtain the medications. People who stick to you and always there to help during tough times in life, specifically those sacrificing their resources to assist you to improve yours at the time you require it the most are referred to as friends (Engster, 70). The reality is that the pharmacist friend is just an associate through the relationship has the possibility of growing to suppose the pharmacist does not notice that the medication was stolen by his friend. The ethical action remains reasonable to me for many reasons, that ethics of cares enables a person to place the people they care for over the people they do not have a mutual relationship with. Literally, it is impossible to care for everyone in the world but we capable of demonstrating kindness and be empathetic to them.
Essentially, in support of my argument on the basis of ethics of care, it is vital to keep in mind that an individual is has a responsibility for any kind of relationship they fall in, even if they are unpleasant. In this situation, the pharmacist who is the parent’s friend owns a pharmacist implying that he is financially stable. This meaning that the financial encumbrance for replacing the stolen medicine will be little to the pharmacist. Just like a battle, parenthood is an obligation whereby observing morality in totality is impossible. Albeit the parent has to lie, betray a friend and steal, she is carrying out all these just to save a child’s life which is the most important thing thus being ethically regarded on the basis of care ethics theory. The main dilemma in this situation is the urgency of the medication facing the parent and the child since after they obtain it as well as the child gets cured, the parent can look for other sources of income to repay the money for the medication that saves her child’s life. Actually, life is a bit intricate than anything that may be recognized by an ethical system described philosophically. Life is special and a gift so the focus should be on curing the child and once she gets the cure, the pharmacist and the parent can converse about the act of stealing in the pharmacist and hopefully come to an understanding by finding a reconciling solution to the issue. This will be the best option as it serves on humanity. Life is sacred and very important and once lost it cannot be recovered. And for the medication in the pharmacist, those are a material possession that can be replaced. Therefore, it is worth stealing to save a life instead of losing a life for observing our moral duties. Ethically, rules are meant to be followed. However, as much as we play by the book in our day to day life, there come situations whereby it is justifiable to break the rules especially when it involves saving someone’s life. Therefore, in this situation, it is justifiable for the parent to steal the medication in order to save her child since it is her moral duty to take care of her child based on theory of care ethics.